Skip to main content

US increased transportation budget proposals

IRF's Washington Programme Centre provides an update on some latest developments in the 2010 Budget plan There has been further recent action from both Congress and the White House on budget plans that will guide the Transportation Reauthorization Bill for the next six years. On 7 May, President Obama proposed large increases for rail and highways in his 2010 Budget plan, including the largest amount of funding that any President has sought for Amtrak, or for the development of high-speed rail in the United
July 12, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
RSS

2462 IRF's Washington Programme Centre provides an update on some latest developments in the 2010 Budget plan

There has been further recent action from both Congress and the White House on budget plans that will guide the Transportation Reauthorization Bill for the next six years.
On 7 May, President Obama proposed large increases for rail and highways in his 2010 Budget plan, including the largest amount of funding that any President has sought for Amtrak, or for the development of high-speed rail in the United States.

Some $1.5 billion was requested for Amtrak and another $1 billion for high-speed rail, in an attempt to lay the foundations for long-term growth. On 29 April, Congress passed the 2010 Budget resolution that establishes a minimum funding level of $324 billion over the next six years for highway, highway safety and transit programmes.
The $324 billion baseline established in the budget represents a 13% increase over the current programme that expires in September. The budget also includes a reserve fund to allow for an increase above this funding level to the extent it can be supported by the Highway Trust Fund.

Transportation Reauthorization Bill

Over the last couple of months, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee has turned its attention to the mammoth Transportation Reauthorization Bill. This bill serves as a blueprint for federal transportation programmes and spending priorities. Rep. Jim Oberstar, (D-Minnesota), Chairman of the House Transportation Committee, has said he intends to use the Bill to continue the recovery efforts initiated by infrastructure spending in the stimulus package, while also modernising the nation's surface transportation systems.

Chairman Oberstar, ranking member John Mica (R-Florida), Highways and Transit Subcommittee Chairman Peter DeFazio (D-Oregon) and ranking member John Duncan (R-Tennessee) have all agreed to an outline of the Reauthorization Bill.
Agreement is reported on the "major parameters of the bill," with the exception of how to pay for it. There will be heightened focus on intermodal travelling and 'livability' ideas, along with language to speed up the project approval process.
Another key issue in the debate will be overhauling the financing mechanism that pays for road construction and other surface transportation programmes.

Chairman Oberstar is hopeful that he will be able to win House approval of the House package by the end of June. He expressed confidence that Congress would meet its deadline for final passage of the Reauthorization Bill by September.

Highway Trust Fund

Despite the proposed funding increases for the Reauthorization Bill, many argue that it still falls short of the sums needed to maintain the current highway system in the United States. It is widely acknowledged that the present fuel tax-based financing system is unsustainable and many have proposed a gradual move towards a system based on direct user payments for miles driven.

The Obama Administration has shown initial interest in boosting transportation spending and put a down-payment in the economic stimulus package earlier this year. But the White House has repeatedly spoken against raising fuel taxes during a recession, or moving to a mileage-based tax.

But Chairman Oberstar said during a recent hearing that he believes a national vehicle miles travelled (VMT) charging system could be phased in within two years and has directed the House Subcommittee on Highways and Transit to explore this proposal further.

Related Content

  • Road user charging proposed for Denmark
    February 15, 2013
    The joint proposal by 3F, the Danish trade union for the transport sector, and think-tank Kraka to replace vehicle registration fees with a GPS-based road user charging system is worth noting. According to 3F and Kraka, this would reduce congestion on Danish roads and generate savings worth €536 million (DKK 4 billion) for the nation’s finances. There is nothing new in this concept as such. Road user charging was proposed a few years ago for the UK and also for the Netherlands. But in the UK this proposal p
  • Tackling the UK's traffic congestion
    February 28, 2012
    The biggest problem on UK roads is congestion, and there is no shortage of ideas as to how it should be tackled. Patrick Smith reports. Congestion (and how to relieve it), along with safety, are among the top priorities facing those responsible for looking after the UK's roads. Road pricing, car-share lanes, greener vehicle initiatives and alternative methods of transport such as buses, trams and rail are all part of the approach, but prior to the current economic climate the nation's love affair with the c
  • US state of Ohio investigates road fund alternatives
    June 15, 2012
    The authorities in the US state of Ohio continue to investigate new methods of generating revenue for highway investment. The state is facing a funding shortfall of up to US$1.6 billion on its highway maintenance and expansion plans to meet traffic volume needs. As a result, the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) is moving forward with a plan to explore the commercial development of certain state-owned rest areas. The state is pursuing the conversion to service plazas of five of the state’s 59 non-int
  • Fuel taxes in more US states to fund roads
    May 3, 2017
    Four more US states are set to increase fuel taxes to support new transportation investments, According to a new report from the American Road Transport Builders Association (ARTBA). This new analysis shows little political fallout from fuel tax rises for transport development. And 91% of legislators who supported an increased fuel tax were re-elected during the next general election; while 98 % of lawmakers won their 2016 primary race. This was an examination of more than 2,500 state legislators from 16 st