Skip to main content

Notified Bodies in the field of Vehicle Restraint Systems; ERF calls for a level playing field

Within the framework of the completion of the internal market, the Member States of the European Union approved the Construction Products Regulation in 2011 Its objective is clear and simple: break down barriers in the field of construction products and create a uniform system of certification that is based on mutual recognition.
June 8, 2015 Read time: 4 mins
Within the framework of the completion of the internal market, the Member States of the European Union approved the Construction Products Regulation in 2011

Its objective is clear and simple: break down barriers in the field of construction products and create a uniform system of certification that is based on mutual recognition.

This would allow companies on the one hand to market their products across the EU with any additional barriers to trade. On the other hand it would allow authorities to enjoy greater choice when procuring construction products.

It goes without saying that this would go hand in hand with a high level of product performance that would also benefit European citizens.

A manufacturer’s passport to the markets of the EU is, in principle, guaranteed by what is commonly referred to as the CE certificate, for example, a document that is issued by a notified body and which states the performance of the product.

Based on the principal of mutual recognition, a CE certificate issued by a notified body in one country is automatically recognised by all others. As such it is eligible for tenders in all EU member states. In this sense, notified bodies act as passport issuers and play a crucial role in safeguarding the integrity of the system.

Unfortunately, the opening of the market has proved to be a mixed blessing for the sector of vehicle restraint systems. While allowing some additional possibilities for companies operating on a pan-European basis and greater choice for authorities, the internal market for vehicle restraint systems is beginning to suffer market distortions that are gradually eroding confidence in the system. The reason: certain notified bodies are not playing by the rules.

Over the past three years, ERF and its members unfortunately have come across numerous practices by certain notified bodies which are not in accordance the provision of law, distort the internal market for vehicle restraint systems and can conceivably put road users at risk.

It is for this reason that the ERF, through its latest position paper, has decided to launch an urgent appeal to authorities to seriously consider the problematic functioning of notified bodies for the hEN 1317-5 for vehicle restraint systems and to take measures for improving the situation.

“We are seeing more and more of these cases, which is why we decided as a group to react and publish this position paper. It outlines a series of incorrect practices and proposes a series of measures to improve the unsatisfactory status quo,” explains Konstandinos Diamandouros, head of office at the 2866 European Union Road Federation and responsible for vehicle restraint systems.

“While it is understandable that some mistakes occur when assessing the performance of products, what we are seeing today in the market cannot be explained by simple error,” explains Jeanne Forêt, chairperson of the ERF Working Group on Road Restraint Systems.  “Most recently, we have even come across CE certificates, which have been issued by notified bodies that are not even notified to the hEN1317-5, a practice which is 100% illegal and cannot be a simple error.” The next steps of the working group will be to raise awareness of the problems encountered in the market and take targeted steps for improving the situation. Among others, this will consist of elaborating informational brochures which can assist road authorities in determining whether a certificate is genuine or not and proposing dedicated information sessions to interested parties.

“We are ready to take the necessary steps to contribute from our side to improve the way notified bodies currently function,” said Diamandouros. “Nevertheless, it is essential that road authorities, national surveillance authorities and the European Commission clearly acknowledge the nature of the problem and start proposing tangible solutions.”



The ERF Position Paper is available in English, French, Italian, Polish and German.  

Contact person: Konstandinos Diamandouros, %$Linker: 2 Email <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 oLinkEmail [email protected] email [email protected] false mailto:[email protected] true false%> / +32-2-6445877


For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • New strategies will help boost road safety worldwide
    November 4, 2013
    *Martin Heath, the Chair of the IRF Group of Experts working group on Engineering Measures for Infrastructure Safety, examines the expected impacts of the new ISO 39001 The excitement and enthusiasm generated by the 2011 launch of the Decade of Action for Road Safety is gradually receding amidst the gloom of an interminably slow global economic recovery. However, a fresh and challenging impetus is about to be given to international road safety management following the publication of a new quality management
  • ERF: LCE4ROADS for sustainability during road construction
    March 28, 2017
    LCE4ROADS is a new certificate assessing sustainability during road construction and rehabilitation Statistics have just been released showing that 2016 was the hottest year in history and reinforcing the concern that climate change is starting to have a real impact on our society. Adaptation to climate change is becoming an ever growing priority for the road infrastructure sector which is looking for new ways to conduct its construction and maintenance operations in a more environmentally friendly ma
  • Developments in tolling technology
    February 27, 2012
    Jason Barnes reviews the last few decades and the future of tolling technology. Tolling and charging technology has evolved significantly over the last three decades and that evolution is perhaps best illustrated by reductions in or complete removal of impedances to physical progress. Once, it was customary for a driver to pull up to a barrier, make some form of cash payment to a human operative in a booth, and then wait for the barrier to be raised before proceeding. Humans were eventually complemented and
  • Safe road barrier innovations
    March 8, 2012
    New road barrier concepts offer major gains in highway safety.