Skip to main content

Performance probe for National Highways

A report published last July concerning England's National Highways agency noted several risk areas where problems could arise and which have now done so, according to UK media reports.
By David Arminas February 21, 2024 Read time: 2 mins
England’s Strategic Road Network that takes in motorways and some major A-class highways – a total of 7,240km (© Jonathan Mitchell/Dreamstime)

England’s National Highways agency is being investigated because “performance has dipped in a number of areas”, the independent regulator Office of Rail and Road announced.

A report published last July noted several risk areas where problems could arise and which have now done so, according to UK media reports. These surround the delivery of major schemes and management of road assets under the five-year plan RIS2 – Road Investment Strategy 2, launched in 2020.

According to UK media, the ORR sent a letter to the National Highways chief customer and strategy officer Elliot Shaw, outlining the concerns of the ORR.

“Whilst each individual item of concern is potentially manageable, the number and breadth of our concerns, the repetitive nature of many concerns, and the proximity to the end of the road period, means that we consider that a more formal approach to assessing National Highways’ performance is now appropriate.”

The letter went on to emphasise that this investigation “is about understanding how National Highways is learning lessons and embedding them in its approach to delivering the RIS. It is not necessarily about resolving individual items”.

The agency manages England’s Strategic Road Network that takes in motorways and some major A-class highways – a total of 7,240km. The SRN is the most heavily used part of England’s roads, carrying a third of all traffic and two-thirds of all freight, according to the agency.

Upon its launch, RIS2 committed the central government to spend €32.02 billion (US$34.5 billion) on building new roads as well as road improvements to “reduce the negative impacts of the existing SRN” and “make the network safer, more reliable and more sensitive to the places through which it runs”.

The Lower Thames Crossing and the Stonehenge Tunnel are among the major projects that the agency wished to start by 2025. But due to planning hold-ups, the schemes have been moved forward to what will be RIS3, the next funding regime up to 2030.

The ORR will consider whether National Highways is meeting its performance target metrics and if it has done enough to reach them. Despite the investigation, though, ORR has said that National Highways has achieved many of its aims and delivered improved roads.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • UK to cut down on “disruptive roadworks”
    January 15, 2024
    The announcement comes today, on the UK’s annual so-called National Pothole Day.
  • UK Concrete outlines framework for ‘beyond net-zero’
    June 15, 2020
    MPA UK Concrete, the group representing the UK concrete industry, has developed a framework to help inform the delivery of an ambitious roadmap for the UK concrete and cement sector to deliver net-negative emissions by 2050.
  • Major capacity upgrade for key junction on UK’s M25 route
    December 18, 2014
    Balfour Beatty and Skanska will carry out a major motorway junction upgrade project worth €69.7 million (£55 million) in the UK. The two companies will operate on the project in a 50:50 joint venture to upgrade junction 30 of the M25 gyratory motorway around capital London. The deal was awarded by the UK’s Highways Agency. This joint venture, Balfour Beatty Skanska, is a construction partner to Connect Plus, the company responsible for managing and upgrading the M25 network. Balfour Beatty Skanska has alrea
  • Lack of foresight for UK roads
    April 26, 2012
    The UK's National Audit Office (NAO) has criticised the Department for Transport's (DfT) budget cuts on the grounds that they will increase costs for users. A new report from the NAO suggests that the DfT has no long term strategy and that the cuts lack strategic understanding.