Skip to main content

New fuel economy targets could cut motoring costs in Europe

Europe’s drivers will be able to save enormous sums of money if ambitious fuel economy targets are introduced by the EU this July. This claim has been made by a former UK Environment Agency chief, Malcolm Fergusson. His study predicts that annual fuel costs for Europe’s drivers could fall by about 23% by 2020 if the currently expected EU fuel efficiency target of 95grammes of CO2 emissions/km for new cars and 147grammes/km for vans is confirmed by the European Commission in July, as expected. If the target
May 18, 2012 Read time: 3 mins

Europe’s drivers will be able to save enormous sums of money if ambitious fuel economy targets are introduced by the EU this July.

This claim has been made by a former UK 2759 Environment Agency chief, Malcolm Fergusson. His study predicts that annual fuel costs for Europe’s drivers could fall by about 23% by 2020 if the currently expected EU fuel efficiency target of 95grammes of CO2 emissions/km for new cars and 147grammes/km for vans is confirmed by the 2465 European Commission in July, as expected. If the target were to be tightened even further, to 60g/km by 2025, then fuel costs could fall by as much as 45%. The research was commissioned by 2499 Greenpeace, whose spokesperson, Franziska Achterberg, said: “The lesson from these figures is clear. A weakened law will pile hundreds of euros extra on drivers' fuel bills, while a strong one will do a lot to shield them from rocketing fuel prices.”

Greenpeace wants motorists to lobby their European Union representatives to support the measure. To arrive at his figures, Fergusson, who has previously reviewed CO2 emission reducing technologies for passenger cars in the EU looked at various scenarios for the UK based on differing emissions reductions technologies and different future fuel prices. Most ambitiously, an 80g/km target for 2020 coupled with a 60g/km goal in 2025 would cut 2030 fuel costs further still. For new cars, the savings figure would soar from £581/year under the 95g/km target in 2020 to an annual £1,216 under the ‘80g/km for 2020 and 60g/km for 2025’ scenario, in 2030.
If motorists save money they tend to drive further. So, Fergusson factored in a mileage increase of 20%. In this scenario, savings would still be made: between £465 under the 95g/km in 2020 picture, rising to £973 in 2030 under the 80g/60g hypothesis. Road transport currently accounts for 22% of the UK’s total carbon dioxide emissions, and an estimated 85% of that figure is attributed to fuel use and servicing operations, so backing this measure would also be of huge benefit to achieving the country's greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. Some automotive businesses are in favour of the 95grammes EU target and said the EU should set a non-binding target for 2025 to provide the car industry with investment security. But some manufacturers have protested about the targets, arguing that it would push up vehicle prices. Europe’s biggest carmaker, the 3503 Volkswagen Group, has described the 2020 target as “not based on sound impact assessment nor on a realistic appreciation of the costs and technical progress necessary to meet the goal within the timescale”.

EU car manufacturers are already on track to meet a 2015 target of 130grammes/km ahead of time, according to data collected by the International Council in Clean transportation, which shows that the average CO2 emissions level of new passenger cars in the EU was around 135g/km last year, a drop of 3.7% on 2010.

What the report does not explain however is how taxation income will be affected. With Europe’s governments all relying heavily on income from fuel taxes, improved fuel economy for the vehicle fleet will trigger a massive shortfall. It seems likely that the European countries will then have to introduce new taxes to offset the drop in income. While motoring may become cheaper as a result of the fuel economy gains, other taxes will offset those savings. And many more countries may consider systems for tolling or road user charging as a way to recoup funds for re-investment into road infrastructure.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Importance of continued transportation investment
    May 2, 2012
    The US infrastructure network requires urgent attention - * T Peter Ruane. America's transportation infrastructure was once the "shining light on top of the hill." Major investments in a national highway, bridge, transit, airport, port and waterway system during the 20th century paid great dividends. The free and efficient flow of goods and people across the 50 states led to unparalleled economic expansion. The mobility and prosperity resulting from an interconnected infrastructure was a model for the world
  • The market is due for a slowdown
    December 13, 2012
    There is nothing that fuels economic uncertainty like economic uncertainty. Lack of confidence amongst investors ensures a reluctance to invest, and that is a common problem for many of the markets around the world at present. The financial crash that started in the US in 2008 and then spread to Europe is an economic malaise that has lasted longer than previous recessions and has had a wider effect for the world economy. Europe has been hard hit and speaking at the recent Committee for European Constructio
  • Smoother roads reduce emissions
    July 25, 2016
    Research reveals that smoother roads can help cut emissions of CO2. This has been announced following the release of the Communication on “A European Strategy for Low-Emission Mobility” (COM (2016) 501) by the European Commission. This covers all transport modes but for road transport, the Communication includes proposals on optimising the transport system, low-emission alternative energy, and low- and zero-emission vehicles. Three associations active in road construction - EUPAVE (the European Concrete
  • EQAR calls for a European-wide recycling plan
    October 13, 2016
    A European-wide construction material recycling strategy should be put in place as soon as possible, according to the European Quality Association for Recycling. EQAR made the call during its annual Congress in the Slovakian capital Bratislava, Slovakia, and on the occasion of its 10th anniversary. In his inaugural address, EQAR president Manfred Wierichs said that recycling of construction material differs greatly among European Union states. This is the case even though construction material recycli